Products · Current maturity

See whether existing work gives you a head start.

Integrity is a working hackathon MVP. Torpedo, Decoy, Clarity, and Adsum are in development. Each page names the usable starting point and the tests a customer engagement would still require.

Start with Integrity See how delivery works

The selection rule

Reusable software still has to prove itself in your environment.

Existing code can save setup time, but it helps only when it fits the customer’s data, controls, users, dependencies, and acceptance tests. Intelligrit proposes reuse only after those conditions are clear enough to test.

Working hackathon system1st place · ACT-IAC 2026

Integrity

Give investigators a prioritized path through 548 million public Medicare rows.

Integrity scores 1.47 million providers and presents behavior patterns in an interactive investigation view. In the company-led hackathon build, 37 high-scoring providers matched public enforcement cases involving $500M+ in alleged or resolved fraud. Four people built it in 13 days as a single compiled system.

Rows: 548M
Matched cases: $500M+
Build period: 13 days
Precision at 100: 42%

See whether Integrity is a fit

In-development foundations

See what each R&D product is intended to do.

Torpedo, Decoy, Clarity, and Adsum are still in development. None is presented as deployed customer capability. A customer engagement would have to test the product against its own data, controls, users, and workflow.

Torpedo

In development

Move task-order work through one governed acquisition flow.

Agreed templates, roles, routing rules, exports, and post-award workflows can reduce handoff and reconstruction work for acquisition teams.

What a customer would still test: An engagement would measure cycle time, document fidelity, audit history, and the completeness of transition artifacts.

Review the current state

Decoy

In development

Build against representative data without copying source values.

Decoy is designed to generate synthetic data inside the customer security boundary and preserve the schema and relationship patterns needed for development and testing.

What a customer would still test: 310+ data types are available; zero source-value leakage and 1:1 volume are targets. Schema fidelity, referential integrity, statistical thresholds, and scale remain acceptance questions.

Review the current state

Clarity

In development

Turn delivery activity into source-linked status reports.

Clarity is designed to answer stakeholder questions from existing project, source-control, documentation, and communication systems, reducing manual status reconstruction.

What a customer would still test: Evidence completeness, source traceability, access controls, and answer quality would be tested; formal acceptance remains a Government decision.

Review the current state

Adsum

In development

Keep distributed work visible on customer-controlled infrastructure.

Adsum is designed to combine virtual-office presence, real-time chat, and conversation reorganization within an explicit deployment boundary.

What a customer would still test: Hosting, identity, retention, accessibility, export, and integration requirements would be defined and tested for the operating environment.

Review the current state

Start with mission fit

Test whether existing work reduces risk for this objective.

Bring the objective, operating environment, and known dependencies. We will identify what can be reused, what must be built, and what the Government would need to test before acceptance.

Assess mission fit